↓ Skip to main content

Development of a High Throughput Platform for Screening Glycoside Hydrolases Based on Oxime-NIMS

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a High Throughput Platform for Screening Glycoside Hydrolases Based on Oxime-NIMS
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Deng, Joel M. Guenther, Jian Gao, Benjamin P. Bowen, Huu Tran, Vimalier Reyes-Ortiz, Xiaoliang Cheng, Noppadon Sathitsuksanoh, Richard Heins, Taichi E. Takasuka, Lai F. Bergeman, Henrik Geertz-Hansen, Samuel Deutsch, Dominique Loqué, Kenneth L. Sale, Blake A. Simmons, Paul D. Adams, Anup K. Singh, Brian G. Fox, Trent R. Northen

Abstract

Cost-effective hydrolysis of biomass into sugars for biofuel production requires high-performance low-cost glycoside hydrolase (GH) cocktails that are active under demanding process conditions. Improving the performance of GH cocktails depends on knowledge of many critical parameters, including individual enzyme stabilities, optimal reaction conditions, kinetics, and specificity of reaction. With this information, rate- and/or yield-limiting reactions can be potentially improved through substitution, synergistic complementation, or protein engineering. Given the wide range of substrates and methods used for GH characterization, it is difficult to compare results across a myriad of approaches to identify high performance and synergistic combinations of enzymes. Here, we describe a platform for systematic screening of GH activities using automatic biomass handling, bioconjugate chemistry, robotic liquid handling, and nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry (NIMS). Twelve well-characterized substrates spanning the types of glycosidic linkages found in plant cell walls are included in the experimental workflow. To test the application of this platform and substrate panel, we studied the reactivity of three engineered cellulases and their synergy of combination across a range of reaction conditions and enzyme concentrations. We anticipate that large-scale screening using the standardized platform and substrates will generate critical datasets to enable direct comparison of enzyme activities for cocktail design.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 28%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Engineering 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,429,163
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,396
of 6,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,826
of 279,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#41
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,561 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.