↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Porosity of Alumina and Zirconia Ceramics toward Pre-Osteoblast Response

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Porosity of Alumina and Zirconia Ceramics toward Pre-Osteoblast Response
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00175
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chrystalleni Hadjicharalambous, Oleg Prymak, Kateryna Loza, Ales Buyakov, Sergei Kulkov, Maria Chatzinikolaidou

Abstract

It is acknowledged that cellular responses are highly affected by biomaterial porosity. The investigation of this effect is important for the development of implanted biomaterials that integrate with bone tissue. Zirconia and alumina ceramics exhibit outstanding mechanical properties and are among the most popular implant materials used in orthopedics, but few data exist regarding the effect of porosity on cellular responses to these materials. The present study investigates the effect of porosity on the attachment and proliferation of pre-osteoblastic cells on zirconia and alumina. For each composition, ceramics of three different porosities are fabricated by sintering, and characterized using scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffraction. Cell proliferation is quantified, and microscopy is employed to qualitatively support the proliferation results and evaluate cell morphology. Cell adhesion and metabolic activity are found comparable among low porosity zirconia and alumina. In contrast, higher porosity favors better cell spreading on zirconia and improves growth, but does not significantly affect cell response on alumina. Between the highest porosity materials, cell response on zirconia is found superior to alumina. Results show that an average pore size of ~150 μm and ~50% porosity can be considered beneficial to cellular growth on zirconia ceramics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 16 26%
Engineering 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Chemistry 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,429,829
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,398
of 6,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,920
of 284,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#37
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.