↓ Skip to main content

A New Thermophilic Nitrilase from an Antarctic Hyperthermophilic Microorganism

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A New Thermophilic Nitrilase from an Antarctic Hyperthermophilic Microorganism
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geraldine V. Dennett, Jenny M. Blamey

Abstract

Several environmental samples from Antarctica were collected and enriched to search for microorganisms with nitrilase activity. A new thermostable nitrilase from a novel hyperthermophilic archaea Pyrococcus sp. M24D13 was purified and characterized. The activity of this enzyme increased as the temperatures rise from 70 up to 85°C. Its optimal activity occurred at 85°C and pH 7.5. This new enzyme shows a remarkable resistance to thermal inactivation retaining more than 50% of its activity even after 8 h of incubation at 85°C. In addition, this nitrilase is highly versatile demonstrating activity toward different substrates, such as benzonitrile (60 mM, aromatic nitrile) and butyronitrile (60 mM, aliphatic nitrile), with a specific activity of 3286.7 U mg(-1) of protein and 4008.2 U mg(-1) of protein, respectively. Moreover the enzyme NitM24D13 also presents cyanidase activity. The apparent Michaelis-Menten constant (K m) and V máx of this Nitrilase for benzonitrile were 0.3 mM and 333.3 μM min(-1), respectively, and the specificity constant (k cat/K m) for benzonitrile was 2.05 × 10(5) s(-1) M(-1).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,793,546
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,897
of 6,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,419
of 297,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#17
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,590 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.