You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In Vitro Tumor Models: Advantages, Disadvantages, Variables, and Selecting the Right Platform
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Moriah E. Katt, Amanda L. Placone, Andrew D. Wong, Zinnia S. Xu, Peter C. Searson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1381 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 280 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 204 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 182 | 13% |
| Researcher | 174 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 58 | 4% |
| Other | 126 | 9% |
| Unknown | 361 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 337 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 133 | 10% |
| Engineering | 132 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 68 | 5% |
| Other | 212 | 15% |
| Unknown | 416 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,973,884
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#231
of 8,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,429
of 414,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.