↓ Skip to main content

In Vitro Bone Cell Models: Impact of Fluid Shear Stress on Bone Formation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
461 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In Vitro Bone Cell Models: Impact of Fluid Shear Stress on Bone Formation
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Wittkowske, Gwendolen C. Reilly, Damien Lacroix, Cecile M. Perrault

Abstract

This review describes the role of bone cells and their surrounding matrix in maintaining bone strength through the process of bone remodeling. Subsequently, this work focusses on how bone formation is guided by mechanical forces and fluid shear stress in particular. It has been demonstrated that mechanical stimulation is an important regulator of bone metabolism. Shear stress generated by interstitial fluid flow in the lacunar-canalicular network influences maintenance and healing of bone tissue. Fluid flow is primarily caused by compressive loading of bone as a result of physical activity. Changes in loading, e.g., due to extended periods of bed rest or microgravity in space are associated with altered bone remodeling and formation in vivo. In vitro, it has been reported that bone cells respond to fluid shear stress by releasing osteogenic signaling factors, such as nitric oxide, and prostaglandins. This work focusses on the application of in vitro models to study the effects of fluid flow on bone cell signaling, collagen deposition, and matrix mineralization. Particular attention is given to in vitro set-ups, which allow long-term cell culture and the application of low fluid shear stress. In addition, this review explores what mechanisms influence the orientation of collagen fibers, which determine the anisotropic properties of bone. A better understanding of these mechanisms could facilitate the design of improved tissue-engineered bone implants or more effective bone disease models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 461 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 461 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 22%
Student > Master 65 14%
Student > Bachelor 57 12%
Researcher 42 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 5%
Other 49 11%
Unknown 124 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 105 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 66 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 7%
Materials Science 19 4%
Other 58 13%
Unknown 146 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2016.
All research outputs
#18,151,354
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,008
of 6,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,894
of 307,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,963 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.