↓ Skip to main content

Biofabrication and Bone Tissue Regeneration: Cell Source, Approaches, and Challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biofabrication and Bone Tissue Regeneration: Cell Source, Approaches, and Challenges
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, March 2017
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monia Orciani, Milena Fini, Roberto Di Primio, Monica Mattioli-Belmonte

Abstract

The growing occurrence of bone disorders and the increase in aging population have resulted in the need for more effective therapies to meet this request. Bone tissue engineering strategies, by combining biomaterials, cells, and signaling factors, are seen as alternatives to conventional bone grafts for repairing or rebuilding bone defects. Indeed, skeletal tissue engineering has not yet achieved full translation into clinical practice because of several challenges. Bone biofabrication by additive manufacturing techniques may represent a possible solution, with its intrinsic capability for accuracy, reproducibility, and customization of scaffolds as well as cell and signaling molecule delivery. This review examines the existing research in bone biofabrication and the appropriate cells and factors selection for successful bone regeneration as well as limitations affecting these approaches. Challenges that need to be tackled with the highest priority are the obtainment of appropriate vascularized scaffolds with an accurate spatiotemporal biochemical and mechanical stimuli release, in order to improve osseointegration as well as osteogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 250 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 16%
Student > Bachelor 37 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 71 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 35 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 10%
Chemistry 17 7%
Materials Science 17 7%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 84 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,455,031
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#993
of 6,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,812
of 309,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,685 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.