You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgical Treatments for Canine Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Assessing Functional Recovery Through Multibody Comparative Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00180 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanni Putame, Mara Terzini, Cristina Bignardi, Brian Beale, Don Hulse, Elisabetta Zanetti, Alberto Audenino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 24 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
| Engineering | 9 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#13,964,401
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,791
of 6,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,035
of 345,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#30
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,840 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.