You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bioengineered Platforms for Chronic Wound Infection Studies: How Can We Make Them More Human-Relevant?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00418 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Snehal Kadam, Shivani Nadkarni, Janhavi Lele, Savani Sakhalkar, Pratiksha Mokashi, Karishma Surendra Kaushik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 7 | 44% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 46 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 10% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,462,120
of 23,376,718 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#140
of 7,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,146
of 461,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#7
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,376,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,000 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.