↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of Gait Mechanics Based on Simulated and Measured IMU Data Using an Artificial Neural Network

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimation of Gait Mechanics Based on Simulated and Measured IMU Data Using an Artificial Neural Network
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marion Mundt, Arnd Koeppe, Sina David, Tom Witter, Franz Bamer, Wolfgang Potthast, Bernd Markert

Abstract

Enhancement of activity is one major topic related to the aging society. Therefore, it is necessary to understand people's motion and identify possible risk factors during activity. Technology can be used to monitor motion patterns during daily life. Especially the use of artificial intelligence combined with wearable sensors can simplify measurement systems and might at some point replace the standard motion capturing using optical measurement technologies. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the estimation of 3D joint angles and joint moments of the lower limbs based on IMU data using a feedforward neural network. The dataset summarizes optical motion capture data of former studies and additional newly collected IMU data. Based on the optical data, the acceleration and angular rate of inertial sensors was simulated. The data was augmented by simulating different sensor positions and orientations. In this study, gait analysis was undertaken with 30 participants using a conventional motion capture set-up based on an optoelectronic system and force plates in parallel with a custom IMU system consisting of five sensors. A mean correlation coefficient of 0.85 for the joint angles and 0.95 for the joint moments was achieved. The RMSE for the joint angle prediction was smaller than 4.8° and the nRMSE for the joint moment prediction was below 13.0%. Especially in the sagittal motion plane good results could be achieved. As the measured dataset is rather small, data was synthesized to complement the measured data. The enlargement of the dataset improved the prediction of the joint angles. While size did not affect the joint moment prediction, the addition of noise to the dataset resulted in an improved prediction accuracy. This indicates that research on appropriate augmentation techniques for biomechanical data is useful to further improve machine learning applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Professor 6 3%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 56 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 65 36%
Sports and Recreations 10 6%
Computer Science 10 6%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 70 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,629,568
of 23,500,709 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,302
of 7,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,175
of 451,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#87
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,500,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.