You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects: Current Clinical Therapeutic Strategies and Future Directions Using 3D Printing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00061 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luciano Vidal, Carina Kampleitner, Meadhbh Á. Brennan, Alain Hoornaert, Pierre Layrolle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 213 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 16% |
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 82 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 13% |
| Engineering | 26 | 12% |
| Materials Science | 22 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 92 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2020.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,369
of 8,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,287
of 484,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#144
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.