You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nanosized Delivery Systems for Therapeutic Proteins: Clinically Validated Technologies and Advanced Development Strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00089 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Filippo Moncalvo, Maria Isabel Martinez Espinoza, Francesco Cellesi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 25% |
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 45 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 17 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2020.
All research outputs
#15,824,664
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,747
of 7,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,397
of 459,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#163
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.