You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimization of Three-Level Cervical Hybrid Surgery to Prevent Adjacent Segment Disease: A Finite Element Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00154 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chia-En Wong, Hsuan-Teh Hu, Meng-Pu Hsieh, Kuo-Yuan Huang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 11 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 17% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#18,716,137
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,484
of 6,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,443
of 361,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#241
of 334 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 334 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.