You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Wearable and Flexible Ozone Generating System for Treatment of Infected Dermal Wounds
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00458 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexander Roth, Ahmed Elkashif, Vidhya Selvamani, Rachel Abigail Stucky, Mohamed N. Seleem, Babak Ziaie, Rahim Rahimi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 23% |
Italy | 1 | 8% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
India | 1 | 8% |
Austria | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
Researcher | 3 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 7 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
Materials Science | 4 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 22 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#646,280
of 24,943,708 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#54
of 8,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,821
of 395,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#6
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,943,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.