You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electrospun Biomaterials in the Treatment and Prevention of Scars in Skin Wound Healing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00481 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eoghan J. Mulholland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Austria | 1 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 14 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 11 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 55 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,061,613
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,118
of 7,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,764
of 399,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#119
of 465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.