You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Toxicity Evaluation of TiO2 Nanoparticles on the 3D Skin Model: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00575 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Priscila Laviola Sanches, Luths Raquel de Oliveira Geaquinto, Rebecca Cruz, Desirée Cigaran Schuck, Márcio Lorencini, José Mauro Granjeiro, Ana Rosa Lopes Ribeiro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2020.
All research outputs
#18,728,392
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,497
of 6,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,557
of 399,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#267
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,890 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.