↓ Skip to main content

A Simple and Non-destructive Method for Chlorophyll Quantification of Chlamydomonas Cultures Using Digital Image Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Simple and Non-destructive Method for Chlorophyll Quantification of Chlamydomonas Cultures Using Digital Image Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2020
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00746
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola J. Wood, Alison Baker, Rupert J. Quinnell, Miller Alonso Camargo-Valero

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Unspecified 6 8%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 23 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Unspecified 6 8%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Chemical Engineering 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#15,087,991
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,254
of 6,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,983
of 399,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#176
of 478 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,899 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 478 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.