You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Short-Step Adjustment and Proximal Compensatory Strategies Adopted by Stroke Survivors With Knee Extensor Spasticity for Obstacle Crossing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00939 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shang-Jun Huang, Xiao-Ming Yu, Kuan Wang, Le-Jun Wang, Xu-Bo Wu, Xie Wu, Wen-Xin Niu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 40% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,812,991
of 24,224,854 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,559
of 7,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,457
of 402,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#136
of 461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,224,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,679 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.