↓ Skip to main content

Perinatal Derivatives: Where Do We Stand? A Roadmap of the Human Placenta and Consensus for Tissue and Cell Nomenclature

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perinatal Derivatives: Where Do We Stand? A Roadmap of the Human Placenta and Consensus for Tissue and Cell Nomenclature
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2020.610544
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonietta Rosa Silini, Roberta Di Pietro, Ingrid Lang-Olip, Francesco Alviano, Asmita Banerjee, Mariangela Basile, Veronika Borutinskaite, Günther Eissner, Alexandra Gellhaus, Bernd Giebel, Yong-Can Huang, Aleksandar Janev, Mateja Erdani Kreft, Nadja Kupper, Ana Clara Abadía-Molina, Enrique G. Olivares, Assunta Pandolfi, Andrea Papait, Michela Pozzobon, Carmen Ruiz-Ruiz, Olga Soritau, Sergiu Susman, Dariusz Szukiewicz, Adelheid Weidinger, Susanne Wolbank, Berthold Huppertz, Ornella Parolini

Abstract

Progress in the understanding of the biology of perinatal tissues has contributed to the breakthrough revelation of the therapeutic effects of perinatal derivatives (PnD), namely birth-associated tissues, cells, and secreted factors. The significant knowledge acquired in the past two decades, along with the increasing interest in perinatal derivatives, fuels an urgent need for the precise identification of PnD and the establishment of updated consensus criteria policies for their characterization. The aim of this review is not to go into detail on preclinical or clinical trials, but rather we address specific issues that are relevant for the definition/characterization of perinatal cells, starting from an understanding of the development of the human placenta, its structure, and the different cell populations that can be isolated from the different perinatal tissues. We describe where the cells are located within the placenta and their cell morphology and phenotype. We also propose nomenclature for the cell populations and derivatives discussed herein. This review is a joint effort from the COST SPRINT Action (CA17116), which broadly aims at approaching consensus for different aspects of PnD research, such as providing inputs for future standards for the processing and in vitro characterization and clinical application of PnD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 33 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 39 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#12,907,845
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,372
of 6,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,785
of 475,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#88
of 340 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,932 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 340 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.