You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Topographic Guidance in Melt-Electrowritten Tubular Scaffolds Enhances Engineered Kidney Tubule Performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.617364 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Metje van Genderen, Katja Jansen, Marleen Kristen, Joost van Duijn, Yang Li, Carl C. L. Schuurmans, Jos Malda, Tina Vermonden, Jitske Jansen, Rosalinde Masereeuw, Miguel Castilho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,117,591
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#856
of 6,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,666
of 502,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#50
of 350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,932 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.