You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hemodynamic Assessment in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease and Aortic Dilation: New Insights From Voxel-By-Voxel Analysis of Reverse Flow, Stasis, and Energetics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2021.725113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Geeraert, Fatemehsadat Jamalidinan, Fiona Burns, Kelly Jarvis, Michael S. Bristow, Carmen Lydell, Silvia S. Hidalgo Tobon, Benito de Celis Alonso, Paul W. M. Fedak, James A. White, Julio Garcia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#17,966,331
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,942
of 6,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344,766
of 507,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#241
of 556 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,761 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 556 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.