↓ Skip to main content

Monitoring Group Activity of Hamsters and Mice as a Novel Tool to Evaluate COVID-19 Progression, Convalescence, and rVSV-ΔG-Spike Vaccination Efficacy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monitoring Group Activity of Hamsters and Mice as a Novel Tool to Evaluate COVID-19 Progression, Convalescence, and rVSV-ΔG-Spike Vaccination Efficacy
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2021.737627
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Melamed, Boaz Politi, Ettie Grauer, Hagit Achdout, Moshe Aftalion, David Gur, Hadas Tamir, Yfat Yahalom-Ronen, Shlomy Maimon, Efi Yitzhak, Shay Weiss, Amir Rosner, Noam Erez, Shmuel Yitzhaki, Shmuel C Shapira, Nir Paran, Emanuelle Mamroud, Yaron Vagima, Tomer Israely

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 6 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 6 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,686,478
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,724
of 6,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,206
of 433,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#130
of 368 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,955 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 368 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.