You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Comparison of Plyometric and Jump Rope Training Programs for Improving Punching Performance in Junior Amateur Boxers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2022.878527 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monchai Chottidao, Chia-Hua Kuo, Shiow-Chwen Tsai, Ing-Shiou Hwang, Jiu-Jenq Lin, Yung-Shen Tsai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 20 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 66% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#15,228,443
of 22,641,687 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,580
of 6,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,966
of 436,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#193
of 602 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,641,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 602 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.