You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Iodine-Rich Nanoadjuvants for CT Imaging–Guided Photodynamic Immunotherapy of Breast Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2022.915067 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoyan Xin, Xiaoyue Ni, Kang Shi, Jie Shao, Yanqiu Zhang, Xin Peng, Wen Yang, Chuanshuai Tian, Wen Zhou, Bing Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#18,131,617
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,002
of 6,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,260
of 434,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#223
of 706 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,942 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 706 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.