You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
General consensus on multimodal functions and validation analysis of perinatal derivatives for regenerative medicine applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2022.961987 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michela Pozzobon, Stefania D’Agostino, Maria G. Roubelakis, Anna Cargnoni, Roberto Gramignoli, Susanne Wolbank, Florelle Gindraux, Sveva Bollini, Halima Kerdjoudj, Mathilde Fenelon, Roberta Di Pietro, Mariangela Basile, Veronika Borutinskaitė, Roberta Piva, Andreina Schoeberlein, Guenther Eissner, Bernd Giebel, Peter Ponsaerts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#16,221,020
of 24,674,524 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,497
of 7,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,225
of 431,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#149
of 719 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,674,524 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,995 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 719 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.