You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of the safe(r) by design alternatives for nanosilver-enabled wound dressings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2022.987650 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
V. Cazzagon, E. Giubilato, A. Bonetto, M. Blosi, I. Zanoni, A. L. Costa, C. Vineis, A. Varesano, A. Marcomini, D. Hristozov, E. Semenzin, E. Badetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 31% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 3 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 15% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,649,901
of 23,570,677 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,313
of 7,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,875
of 441,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#62
of 701 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,570,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 701 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.