You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Computer-aided screening of aspiration risks in dysphagia with wearable technology: a Systematic Review and meta-analysis on test accuracy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1205009 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Derek Ka-Hei Lai, Ethan Shiu-Wang Cheng, Hyo-Jung Lim, Bryan Pak-Hei So, Wing-Kai Lam, Daphne Sze Ki Cheung, Duo Wai-Chi Wong, James Chung-Wai Cheung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 33% |
Russia | 1 | 33% |
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 21% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#16,761,466
of 24,654,957 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#2,990
of 7,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,206
of 352,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#91
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,654,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,986 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.