↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel minimally invasive pedicle bone cement screw applied to the treatment of Kümmel’s disease in porcine vertebrae

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomechanical evaluation of a novel minimally invasive pedicle bone cement screw applied to the treatment of Kümmel’s disease in porcine vertebrae
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, July 2023
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1218478
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiang Ma, Qing Feng, Xingze Zhang, Xiaolei Sun, Longwei Lin, Lin Guo, Lijun An, Shenglin Cao, Jun Miao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#21,505,795
of 24,010,679 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#5,037
of 7,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,746
of 173,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#83
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,010,679 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,558 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.