↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations from the COST action CA17116 (SPRINT) for the standardization of perinatal derivative preparation and in vitro testing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommendations from the COST action CA17116 (SPRINT) for the standardization of perinatal derivative preparation and in vitro testing
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, November 2023
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1258753
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleksandar Janev, Asmita Banerjee, Adelheid Weidinger, Jure Dimec, Brane Leskošek, Antonietta Rosa Silini, Tina Cirman, Susanne Wolbank, Taja Železnik Ramuta, Urška Dragin Jerman, Assunta Pandolfi, Roberta Di Pietro, Michela Pozzobon, Bernd Giebel, Günther Eissner, Polonca Ferk, Ingrid Lang-Olip, Francesco Alviano, Olga Soritau, Ornella Parolini, Mateja Erdani Kreft

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#16,886,902
of 24,827,122 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,013
of 8,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,551
of 184,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#24
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,827,122 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.