↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Construction of smart materials for biomedical application

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Construction of smart materials for biomedical application
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2023
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1278243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fei Chen, Jie Dong, Wen Sun, Daniele Di Iorio, Seraphine V. Wegner, Wenbin Zeng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#19,096,905
of 24,315,442 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,222
of 7,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,756
of 155,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#29
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,315,442 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,753 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.