↓ Skip to main content

HyCas9-12aGEP: an efficient genome editing platform for Corynebacterium glutamicum

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HyCas9-12aGEP: an efficient genome editing platform for Corynebacterium glutamicum
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1327172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng Zhang, Jin-Yu Wang, Chang-Lon Li, Wei-Guo Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,546,226
of 26,122,087 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,544
of 8,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,889
of 347,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#61
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,122,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,687 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.