You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening, identification, and mechanism analysis of starch-degrading bacteria during curing process in tobacco leaf
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1332113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yan Zhang, Chuandong Jiang, Yangyang Li, Jingguo Sun, Zhenguo Chen, Qiang Zhang, Guangwei Sun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,869,880
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#4,107
of 8,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,674
of 211,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#45
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.