↓ Skip to main content

Combining photodynamic therapy and cascade chemotherapy for enhanced tumor cytotoxicity: the role of CTT2P@B nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combining photodynamic therapy and cascade chemotherapy for enhanced tumor cytotoxicity: the role of CTT2P@B nanoparticles
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1361966
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rongyi Wang, Hongsen Li, Lu Han, Boao Han, Yiting Bao, Hongwei Fan, Chaoyue Sun, Ruijie Qian, Liying Ma, Jiajing Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,733,457
of 25,355,907 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#5,286
of 8,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,933
of 166,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#50
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,355,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.