↓ Skip to main content

Screening and construction of nanobodies against human CD93 using phage libraries and study of their antiangiogenic effects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening and construction of nanobodies against human CD93 using phage libraries and study of their antiangiogenic effects
Published in
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1372245
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Miao, Yiling Wu, Hao Ouyang, Peiwen Zhang, Wenyun Zheng, Xingyuan Ma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,678,998
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,199
of 8,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,805
of 198,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#16
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,658 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.