↓ Skip to main content

Cellular prion protein and NMDA receptor modulation: protecting against excitotoxicity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cellular prion protein and NMDA receptor modulation: protecting against excitotoxicity
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2014.00045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefanie A. G. Black, Peter K. Stys, Gerald W. Zamponi, Shigeki Tsutsui

Abstract

Although it is well established that misfolding of the cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) into the β-sheet-rich, aggregated scrapie conformation (PrP(Sc)) causes a variety of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), the physiological roles of PrP(C) are still incompletely understood. There is accumulating evidence describing the roles of PrP(C) in neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. Recently, we identified a functional regulation of NMDA receptors by PrP(C) that involves formation of a physical protein complex between these proteins. Excessive NMDA receptor activity during conditions such as ischemia mediates enhanced Ca(2+) entry into cells and contributes to excitotoxic neuronal death. In addition, NMDA receptors and/or PrP(C) play critical roles in neuroinflammation and glial cell toxicity. Inhibition of NMDA receptor activity protects against PrP(Sc)-induced neuronal death. Moreover, in mice lacking PrP(C), infarct size is increased after focal cerebral ischemia, and absence of PrP(C) increases susceptibility of neurons to NMDA receptor-dependent death. Recently, PrP(C) was found to be a receptor for oligomeric beta-amyloid (Aβ) peptides, suggesting a role for PrP(C) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Our recent findings suggest that Aβ peptides enhance NMDA receptor current by perturbing the normal copper- and PrP(C)-dependent regulation of these receptors. Here, we review evidence highlighting a role for PrP(C) in preventing NMDA receptor-mediated excitotoxicity and inflammation. There is a need for more detailed molecular characterization of PrP(C)-mediated regulation of NMDA receptors, such as determining which NMDA receptor subunits mediate pathogenic effects upon loss of PrP(C)-mediated regulation and identifying PrP(C) binding site(s) on the receptor. This knowledge will allow development of novel therapeutic interventions for not only TSEs, but also for AD and other neurodegenerative disorders involving dysfunction of PrP(C).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 27%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Master 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Professor 6 7%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 18%
Neuroscience 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#18,170,573
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#4,461
of 9,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,774
of 237,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,316 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.