↓ Skip to main content

The Exocyst Complex in Health and Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Exocyst Complex in Health and Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, April 2016
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2016.00024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Martin-Urdiroz, Michael J. Deeks, Connor G. Horton, Helen R. Dawe, Isabelle Jourdain

Abstract

Exocytosis involves the fusion of intracellular secretory vesicles with the plasma membrane, thereby delivering integral membrane proteins to the cell surface and releasing material into the extracellular space. Importantly, exocytosis also provides a source of lipid moieties for membrane extension. The tethering of the secretory vesicle before docking and fusion with the plasma membrane is mediated by the exocyst complex, an evolutionary conserved octameric complex of proteins. Recent findings indicate that the exocyst complex also takes part in other intra-cellular processes besides secretion. These various functions seem to converge toward defining a direction of membrane growth in a range of systems from fungi to plants and from neurons to cilia. In this review we summarize the current knowledge of exocyst function in cell polarity, signaling and cell-cell communication and discuss implications for plant and animal health and disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 164 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 22%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 44 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 22%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 44 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,713,365
of 23,573,233 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#823
of 9,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,927
of 302,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,573,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,452 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.