↓ Skip to main content

Tetraspanins Function as Regulators of Cellular Signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tetraspanins Function as Regulators of Cellular Signaling
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2017.00034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina M. Termini, Jennifer M. Gillette

Abstract

Tetraspanins are molecular scaffolds that distribute proteins into highly organized microdomains consisting of adhesion, signaling, and adaptor proteins. Many reports have identified interactions between tetraspanins and signaling molecules, finding unique downstream cellular consequences. In this review, we will explore these interactions as well as the specific cellular responses to signal activation, focusing on tetraspanin regulation of adhesion-mediated (integrins/FAK), receptor-mediated (EGFR, TNF-α, c-Met, c-Kit), and intracellular signaling (PKC, PI4K, β-catenin). Additionally, we will summarize our current understanding for how tetraspanin post-translational modifications (palmitoylation, N-linked glycosylation, and ubiquitination) can regulate signal propagation. Many of the studies outlined in this review suggest that tetraspanins offer a potential therapeutic target to modulate aberrant signal transduction pathways that directly impact a host of cellular behaviors and disease states.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 333 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 23%
Student > Bachelor 47 14%
Researcher 41 12%
Student > Master 40 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Other 32 10%
Unknown 77 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 116 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 25 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 7%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 88 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,499,697
of 24,654,416 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#1,783
of 10,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,359
of 314,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#17
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,654,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,082 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.