↓ Skip to main content

Growth Rate as a Direct Regulator of the Start Network to Set Cell Size

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Growth Rate as a Direct Regulator of the Start Network to Set Cell Size
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2017.00057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martí Aldea, Kirsten Jenkins, Attila Csikász-Nagy

Abstract

Cells are able to adjust their growth and size to external inputs to comply with specific fates and developmental programs. Molecular pathways controlling growth also have an enormous impact in cell size, and bacteria, yeast, or epithelial cells modify their size as a function of growth rate. This universal feature suggests that growth (mass) and proliferation (cell number) rates are subject to general coordinating mechanisms. However, the underlying molecular connections are still a matter of debate. Here we review the current ideas on growth and cell size control, and focus on the possible mechanisms that could link the biosynthetic machinery to the Start network in budding yeast. In particular, we discuss the role of molecular chaperones in a competition framework to explain cell size control by growth at the individual cell level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 28%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor 6 7%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 31%
Engineering 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,427,910
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#1,429
of 9,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,695
of 313,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.