↓ Skip to main content

Subversion of the Endocytic and Secretory Pathways by Bacterial Effector Proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subversion of the Endocytic and Secretory Pathways by Bacterial Effector Proteins
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2018.00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary M. Weber, Robert Faris

Abstract

Intracellular bacteria have developed numerous strategies to hijack host vesicular trafficking pathways to form their unique replicative niches. To promote intracellular replication, the bacteria must interact with host organelles and modulate host signaling pathways to acquire nutrients and membrane for the growing parasitophorous vacuole all while suppressing activation of the immune response. To facilitate host cell subversion, bacterial pathogens use specialized secretion systems to deliver bacterial virulence factors, termed effectors, into the host cell that mimic, agonize, and/or antagonize the function of host proteins. In this review we will discuss how bacterial effector proteins from Coxiella burnetii, Brucella abortus, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Orientia tsutsugamushi manipulate the endocytic and secretory pathways. Understanding how bacterial effector proteins manipulate host processes not only gives us keen insight into bacterial pathogenesis, but also enhances our understanding of how eukaryotic membrane trafficking is regulated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 32 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 4%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 37 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2018.
All research outputs
#18,584,192
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#5,003
of 9,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,384
of 441,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#30
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.