You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Changes in Protein O-GlcNAcylation During Mouse Epididymal Sperm Maturation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2018.00060 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darya A. Tourzani, Bidur Paudel, Patricia V. Miranda, Pablo E. Visconti, María G. Gervasi |
| Abstract |
After leaving the testis, sperm undergo two sequential maturational processes before acquiring fertilizing capacity: sperm maturation in the male epididymis, and sperm capacitation in the female reproductive tract. During their transit through the epididymis, sperm experience several maturational changes; the acquisition of motility is one of them. The molecular basis of the regulation of this process is still not fully understood. Sperm are both transcriptionally and translationally silent, therefore post-translational modifications are essential to regulate their function. The post-translational modification by the addition of O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) can act as a counterpart of phosphorylation in different cellular processes. Therefore, our work was aimed to characterize the O-GlcNAcylation system in the male reproductive tract and the occurrence of this phenomenon during sperm maturation. Our results indicate that O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT), the enzyme responsible for O-GlcNAcylation, is present in the testis, epididymis and immature caput sperm. Its presence is significantly reduced in mature cauda sperm. Consistently, caput sperm display high levels of O-GlcNAcylation when compared to mature cauda sperm, where it is mostly absent. Our results indicate that the modulation of O-GlcNAcylation takes place during sperm maturation and suggest a role for this post-translational modification in this process. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 57% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,639,173
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#5,041
of 9,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,534
of 328,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#26
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.