You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification and validation of a novel cuproptosis-related gene signature in multiple myeloma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2023.1159355 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bingxin Zhang, Quanqiang Wang, Tianyu Zhang, Ziwei Zheng, Zhili Lin, Shujuan Zhou, Dong Zheng, Zixing Chen, Sisi Zheng, Yu Zhang, Xuanru Lin, Rujiao Dong, Jingjing Chen, Honglan Qian, Xudong Hu, Yan Zhuang, Qianying Zhang, Zhouxiang Jin, Songfu Jiang, Yongyong Ma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,778,537
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#2,346
of 9,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,846
of 292,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#41
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,526 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.