You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Artificial intelligence-based analysis of time-lapse images of sphere formation and process of plate adhesion and spread of pancreatic cancer cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2023.1290753 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuuki Shichi, Fujiya Gomi, Yasuko Hasegawa, Keisuke Nonaka, Seiichi Shinji, Kimimasa Takahashi, Toshiyuki Ishiwata |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#15,475,886
of 24,989,834 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#3,006
of 10,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,748
of 252,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#43
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,989,834 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,273 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.