You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes as a model to study the role of small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (SK) ion channel variants associated with atrial fibrillation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcell.2024.1298007 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hosna Babini, Verónica Jiménez-Sábado, Ekaterina Stogova, Alia Arslanova, Mariam Butt, Saif Dababneh, Parisa Asghari, Edwin D. W. Moore, Thomas W. Claydon, Nipavan Chiamvimonvat, Leif Hove-Madsen, Glen F. Tibbits |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 67% |
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,626,020
of 25,214,112 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#3,041
of 10,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,733
of 161,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#22
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,214,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.