↓ Skip to main content

Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields facilitate both osteoblast and osteoclast activity through Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the zebrafish scale

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields facilitate both osteoblast and osteoclast activity through Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the zebrafish scale
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2024.1340089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingjing Kobayashi-Sun, Isao Kobayashi, Makoto Kashima, Jun Hirayama, Makiko Kakikawa, Sotoshi Yamada, Nobuo Suzuki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,709,862
of 25,328,635 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#6,846
of 10,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,002
of 159,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#31
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,328,635 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.