↓ Skip to main content

Allosteric modulation of protein oligomerization: an emerging approach to drug design

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Allosteric modulation of protein oligomerization: an emerging approach to drug design
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2014.00009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronen Gabizon, Assaf Friedler

Abstract

Many disease-related proteins are in equilibrium between different oligomeric forms. The regulation of this equilibrium plays a central role in maintaining the activity of these proteins in vitro and in vivo. Modulation of the oligomerization equilibrium of proteins by molecules that bind preferentially to a specific oligomeric state is emerging as a potential therapeutic strategy that can be applied to many biological systems such as cancer and viral infections. The target proteins for such compounds are diverse in structure and sequence, and may require different approaches for shifting their oligomerization equilibrium. The discovery of such oligomerization-modulating compounds is thus achieved based on existing structural knowledge about the specific target proteins, as well as on their interactions with partner proteins or with ligands. In silico design and combinatorial tools such as peptide arrays and phage display are also used for discovering compounds that modulate protein oligomerization. The current review highlights some of the recent developments in the design of compounds aimed at modulating the oligomerization equilibrium of proteins, including the "shiftides" approach developed in our lab.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 103 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 30%
Researcher 22 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Master 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 21%
Chemistry 22 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2014.
All research outputs
#12,583,054
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#656
of 5,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,486
of 223,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,893 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.