You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does groundwater protection in Europe require new EU-wide environmental quality standards?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2014.00032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Balderacchi, Maria Filippini, Alexandra Gemitzi, Björn Klöve, Marco Petitta, Marco Trevisan, Przemysław Wachniew, Stanisław Witczak, Alessandro Gargini |
| Abstract |
The European Groundwater Directive could be improved by limiting the scopes of the Annexes I and II to the manmade and natural substances, respectively, and by defining a common monitoring protocol. The changes in the European landuse patterns, in particular the urban sprawl phenomena, obscure the distinction between the point and diffuse sources of contamination. In the future more importance will be given to the household contamination. Moreover, the agricultural environment could be used for developing new conceptual models related to the pharmaceuticals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2014.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#3,266
of 6,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,573
of 244,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#20
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,832 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.