↓ Skip to main content

Nanoparticles from renewable polymers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanoparticles from renewable polymers
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2014.00049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederik R. Wurm, Clemens K. Weiss

Abstract

The use of polymers from natural resources can bring many benefits for novel polymeric nanoparticle systems. Such polymers have a variety of beneficial properties such as biodegradability and biocompatibility, they are readily available on large scale and at low cost. As the amount of fossil fuels decrease, their application becomes more interesting even if characterization is in many cases more challenging due to structural complexity, either by broad distribution of their molecular weights (polysaccharides, polyesters, lignin) or by complex structure (proteins, lignin). This review summarizes different sources and methods for the preparation of biopolymer-based nanoparticle systems for various applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 199 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 17%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 42 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 41 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 9%
Engineering 16 8%
Other 43 21%
Unknown 51 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,388,554
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#832
of 6,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,571
of 239,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,765 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.