You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biomolecular corona on nanoparticles: a survey of recent literature and its implications in targeted drug delivery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2014.00108 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan M. Pearson, Vanessa V. Juettner, Seungpyo Hong |
| Abstract |
Achieving controlled cellular responses of nanoparticles (NP) is critical for the successful development and translation of NP-based drug delivery systems. However, precise control over the physicochemical and biological properties of NPs could become convoluted, diminished, or completely lost as a result of the adsorption of biomolecules to their surfaces. Characterization of the formation of the "biomolecular" corona has thus received increased attention due to its impact on NP and protein structure as well as its negative effect on NP-based targeted drug delivery. This review presents a concise survey of the recent literature concerning the importance of the NP-biomolecule corona and how it can be utilized to improve the in vivo efficacy of targeted delivery systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Argentina | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 21% |
| Researcher | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 28 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 11% |
| Engineering | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,491,246
of 25,350,078 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#298
of 6,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,243
of 374,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,350,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,723 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.