↓ Skip to main content

Radiation-induced formation of purine lesions in single and double stranded DNA: revised quantification

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiation-induced formation of purine lesions in single and double stranded DNA: revised quantification
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2015.00018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael A. Terzidis, Carla Ferreri, Chryssostomos Chatgilialoglu

Abstract

The formation of oxidative lesions arising from double stranded DNA damage is of major significance to chemical biology from the perspective of application to human health. The quantification of purine lesions arising from γ-radiation-induced hydroxyl radicals (HO(•)) has been the subject of numerous studies, with discrepancies on the measured 5',8-cyclo-2'-deoxyadenosine (cdA) and 5',8-cyclo-2'-deoxyguanosine (cdG) lesions reported by different groups. Here we applied an ameliorative protocol for the analysis of DNA damage with quantitative determination of these lesions via isotope dilution liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Tandem-type purine lesions were quantified along with 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG) and 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyadenosine (8-oxo-dA) in single and double stranded DNA, generated during DNA exposure to diffusible HO(•) radicals in the absence or presence of physiological levels of oxygen. The cdA and cdG lesions in absence of oxygen were found ~2 times higher in single than double stranded DNA, with 5'R being ~6.5 and ~1.5 times more predominant than 5'S in cdG and cdA, respectively. Interestingly, in the presence of 5% molecular oxygen the R/S ratios are retained with substantially decreased yields for cdA and cdG, whereas 8-oxo-dA and 8-oxo-dG remain nearly constant. The overall lesion formation follows the order: 8-oxo-dG > 8-oxo-dA > 5'R-cdG > 5'R-cdA > 5'S-cdA > 5'S-cdG. By this method, there was a conclusive evaluation of radiation-induced DNA purine lesions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Professor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,265,771
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,899
of 5,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,605
of 262,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,897 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.