↓ Skip to main content

Nanomaterials in consumer products: a challenging analytical problem

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanomaterials in consumer products: a challenging analytical problem
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2015.00048
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catia Contado

Abstract

Many products used in everyday life are made with the assistance of nanotechnologies. Cosmetic, pharmaceuticals, sunscreen, powdered food are only few examples of end products containing nano-sized particles (NPs), generally added to improve the product quality. To evaluate correctly benefits vs. risks of engineered nanomaterials and consequently to legislate in favor of consumer's protection, it is necessary to know the hazards connected with the exposure levels. This information implies transversal studies and a number of different competences. On analytical point of view the identification, quantification and characterization of NPs in food matrices and in cosmetic or personal care products pose significant challenges, because NPs are usually present at low concentration levels and the matrices, in which they are dispersed, are complexes and often incompatible with analytical instruments that would be required for their detection and characterization. This paper focused on some analytical techniques suitable for the detection, characterization and quantification of NPs in food and cosmetics products, reports their recent application in characterizing specific metal and metal-oxide NPs in these two important industrial and market sectors. The need of a characterization of the NPs as much as possible complete, matching complementary information about different metrics, possible achieved through validate procedures, is what clearly emerges from this research. More work should be done to produce standardized materials and to set-up methodologies to determine number-based size distributions and to get quantitative date about the NPs in such a complex matrices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 298 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 23%
Student > Master 49 16%
Researcher 31 10%
Other 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 65 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 63 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 8%
Environmental Science 21 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 89 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,059,961
of 23,569,120 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#527
of 6,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,705
of 265,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,569,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,195 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.