You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Editorial: Cancer Nanotheranostics: What Have We Learned So Far?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2015.00071 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
João Conde, Furong Tian, Jesus M. de la Fuente, Pedro V. Baptista |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 33% |
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 25% |
Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 7 | 18% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,844,245
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#1,266
of 6,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,341
of 402,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.